AI-native
01The ideas

7 ideas, each with its MIT course.

01

Write down what “working” means before you build.

Most overruns trace back to missing or over-ambitious requirements. Write what the system must do, measurably, and test against it. The Mars Climate Orbiter was lost when a units rule never reached the build.

In practice: Match rigor to the stakes. The DC-3 was specified in 3 pages and a phone call.

Fundamentals of Systems Engineering · MIT 16.842 · fall 2015

02

Separate what it must do from how you build it.

Requirements say what to achieve, and how well. Specs say how it gets built. Owners jump to a tool (“we need a chatbot”) before naming the outcome.

In practice: You sign off on the outcome, so the tool can change later. Don’t let a named tool become the requirement.

Fundamentals of Systems Engineering · MIT 16.842 · fall 2015

03

Most failures live at the interfaces, not inside the parts.

Teams polish the parts and neglect the hand-offs between them. The Ariane 501 rocket was lost when one part’s test data was read as flight data. In a business, leads die quietly in the gaps between tools.

In practice: The fix is cheap: name every hand-off, define what crosses it, test it with real data.

Fundamentals of Systems Engineering · MIT 16.842 · fall 2015

04

Verification and validation are different questions. Answer both.

Verification asks: was it built right, to the written requirements? Validation asks: was the right thing built? Every metric can be green while the business still books no jobs.

In practice: Verification can be automated. Validation needs a real signal, like a booked call or a paying customer. It is the check owners skip.

Fundamentals of Systems Engineering · MIT 16.842 · fall 2015

05

A system’s life is mostly after launch. Design for the running.

Launch starts the longest phase: running, watching, fixing and upgrading. A machine nobody watches decays as the market, the ad platforms and the audience shift.

In practice: This is the engineering case for a monthly relationship over a one-time build. Decide at design time who runs it, and how often.

Fundamentals of Systems Engineering · MIT 16.842 · fall 2015

06

The pieces must fit each other, not just be good alone.

Capacity, process, sourcing, people and software must fit the plan and each other. A great ad account and a great closer still lose if the ads promise what the process can’t deliver.

In practice: Run the fit test before you add a tool or channel, and again as markets move.

Operations Strategy · MIT 15.769 · fall 2010

07

You don’t fix a number. You fix the loop that produces it.

System dynamics studies feedback loops, stocks and flows. A metric is an output, so chasing it treats the symptom. A small change in the loop compounds.

In practice: Loops are easy to draw and hard to time. Confirm the real delay before you act, or you’ll overcorrect.

Introduction to System Dynamics · MIT 15.871 · fall 2013 (Profs. John Sterman & Hazhir Rahmandad)

02In our work

Where this shows up in our work.

Most failures live in the gaps between apps. That is where owners end up carrying the work. If you’re the glue between your apps, you’re not AI-native yet.

03Start

Start with the map. It’s free.

This is the thinking. The machine is the work. A 20-minute call shows where to start. You keep the written plan, whether you hire us or not.

Claim my free AI-Native MapEmail usText us

contact@paperst.ai · (747) 745-5837